Documentation-as-a-directory for software features. Each feature is a
Markdown + Gherkin document; its design spec, plan, acceptance tests, and
optional surface/log trail live as stem-qualified siblings beside it;
tasks live only under a paired slug/ directory; an opinionated CLI
validates the whole bundle so it can never silently drift.
docs/features/
├── INDEX.md # bundle root (pins fdf_version)
├── LOG.md
├── SPEC.md # the format spec, shipped in the bundle
├── STACK.md # Context: technology stack
├── ARCHITECTURE.md # Context: architecture & principles
├── SURFACES.md # Context: interface principles (all surfaces)
├── INFRA.md # Context: build & deployment infra
└── payments/
├── INDEX.md
├── instant-refunds.md # Feature: Gherkin scenarios + status
├── instant-refunds.spec.md # approved design (type: Spec)
├── instant-refunds.plan.md # links every task (type: Plan)
├── instant-refunds.test.md # scenario -> concrete proof (type: Test)
├── instant-refunds.surface.md # optional (type: Surface)
├── instant-refunds.log.md # optional feature decisions
└── instant-refunds/ # task directory ONLY
├── 01-refund-api.md
└── 02-refund-ui.md
The four Context documents (STACK.md, ARCHITECTURE.md,
SURFACES.md, INFRA.md) are the project's living stack / architecture /
surface-principles / infrastructure snapshot. SURFACES.md is always
defined at the bundle root (interface principles for APIs, UIs, CLIs,
events, and inputs — not “UI only”); feature-level slug.surface.md is
optional when a feature needs extra surface detail. fdf init scaffolds
all four as stubs; the fdf-init skill interview fills them. They are
critical and change only with explicit human approval — accurate context is
what makes this agentic engineering, not vibe coding.
Why
Agents made writing code cheap. What broke is the record of why the code
exists: the design lived in a chat scrollback that is gone, the plan was
never written down, and the tests prove whatever the code happens to do.
That is vibe coding, and it compounds — every future change starts from
archaeology.
FDF is the opposite bet: the documentation is the interface between humans
and agents. Intent, design, plan, and proof live in the repo beside the
code; a feature's status must say what is actually true of it; and
fdf validate turns drift into a failing build instead of a discovery six
months later. Humans approve specs and context; agents do the mechanical
work in between. Built for agentic engineering, not vibe coding.
Install
- One-liner (macOS/Linux, no Go needed):
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GiteshDalal/fdf/main/install.sh | bash
mise use ubi:GiteshDalal/fdf
go install github.com/GiteshDalal/fdf/cli/cmd/fdf@latest
Use
fdf init # scaffold docs/features/ + SPEC.md + context stubs (or FDF_ROOT_DIR / --root)
# then run the fdf-init skill to fill STACK/ARCHITECTURE/SURFACES/INFRA
fdf new payments/instant-refunds
fdf validate # F1-F9 + R1; exit 1 on any violation
fdf serve # browse the bundle (bun x mdts)
fdf install claude-code # user-level skills + "## Feature Document Format" primer
fdf install codex # (primer skipped if the heading is already present)
fdf install opencode
fdf install --project claude-code # project-level: skills under .claude/, primer in ./CLAUDE.md
fdf migrate # mechanical upgrade between adjacent spec versions (e.g. 0.3 → 0.4)
fdf install defaults to user-level (under your home directory). Prefer
fdf install --project <harness> for repos that actually carry an FDF bundle:
skills and the primer stay out of unrelated projects, and a stale primer after
fdf migrate is a per-repo refresh instead of a machine-global one. User-level
and project-level installs coexist and upgrade independently (each destination
has its own .fdf-version markers). A machine with both will carry two primers
— harnesses merge memory files, so that is fine.
| Scope |
Harness |
Skills |
Instruction file |
Commands |
| user |
claude-code |
~/.claude/skills/ |
~/.claude/CLAUDE.md |
~/.claude/commands/ |
| user |
codex |
~/.codex/skills/ |
~/.codex/AGENTS.md |
— |
| user |
opencode |
~/.config/opencode/skills/ |
~/.config/opencode/AGENTS.md |
— |
| project |
claude-code |
<proj>/.claude/skills/ |
<proj>/CLAUDE.md |
<proj>/.claude/commands/ |
| project |
codex |
<proj>/.codex/skills/ |
<proj>/AGENTS.md |
— |
| project |
opencode |
<proj>/.opencode/skills/ |
<proj>/AGENTS.md |
— |
--project outside a git working tree is a usage error (exit 2).
fdf install --root <dir> (or FDF_ROOT_DIR) bakes a non-default bundle
location into the installed skills, which otherwise reference
docs/features/; it composes with --project unchanged. Agents need no prior
FDF knowledge: the spec copy at the bundle root is the reference the skills
and primer point them to.
Works the same everywhere: the bundle may be a plain directory or a git
submodule mounted at the same path — resource: paths always verify against
the project root.
Upgrading from v0.3
- Run
fdf migrate on the bundle (rewrites the pin, moves nested trail
files to stem-qualified siblings, scaffolds SURFACES.md if missing).
- Re-run
fdf install for each harness you use. Primers and skills
written under 0.3 describe the paired-directory model (slug/SPEC.md,
three Context docs) and stay stale in global CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md until
refreshed. fdf install upgrades skills automatically when the version
marker changes; if your primer heading already exists with old wording,
edit or replace that section so agents see stem trails and four Context
docs.
Spec
FDF is defined by versioned specs under spec/ — current
v0.4, prior v0.3 / v0.2;
SPEC.md indexes them. Each is normative for the bundles pinning
its version, and every bundle vendors its pinned version's spec at
docs/features/SPEC.md. testdata/ fixtures are the executable conformance
contract. MIT licensed.