Help us shape the future of Go! Take the 2026 Go Developer Survey

costmaxx

module
v0.1.2 Latest Latest
Warning

This package is not in the latest version of its module.

Go to latest
Published: Aug 5, 2026 License: MIT

README

CostMax

A local-first efficiency layer for coding agents. It shrinks the tool output your agent has to read, keeps the full evidence, and proves the saving instead of claiming it.

ci Release Downloads Go

Coding agents burn tokens on output they barely use: 1,000-line test runs for three failing tests, full diffs for a rename, complete build logs for one error. CostMax intercepts those commands, returns the model a compact summary, and keeps the raw output retrievable by digest.

Local-first: nothing leaves your machine. Codex CLI only, as an opt-in MCP server. Hooks are observe-only.

Install

# From source
go install github.com/derinbarutcu17/costmaxx/cmd/costmax@latest

# Or a release binary (all platforms in Releases)
# macOS arm64:
curl -L -o costmaxx https://github.com/derinbarutcu17/costmaxx/releases/latest/download/costmaxx-darwin-arm64
chmod +x costmaxx

Quickstart

Add CostMax's MCP entry to your Codex config (a backup is made first):

costmaxx install
costmaxx doctor

That writes this block to ~/.codex/config.toml:

[mcp_servers.costmaxx]
command = "/path/to/costmaxx"
args = ["mcp"]

costmax_run is now available to Codex:

costmax_run — executes a local command and returns a compact, digest-addressable summary. Full output stored locally, retrievable via cmx://artifact/<id>.

It executes commands with your process permissions; it is not a sandbox.


The same failing test run, two ways

The model sees the exact signal it needs: pass/fail counts, failing test names, duration. The full raw output stays local, zstd-compressed, content-addressed, and byte-for-byte retrievable.


How it works

Every stage is deterministic. The same command, the same output, the same compact summary, every time. No model in the loop for reduction, no guesses in the policy, no way to claim a saving that the rendered response does not deliver.


The proof

CostMax's savings claims come from a live evaluation, not a benchmark script that ran once on a laptop. One fresh binary, 20 deterministic fixtures, 3 repetitions, audited from the raw Codex transcripts.

Benchmark What it measures Result
20 deterministic fixtures × 3 reps Model-visible tool output (len/4 estimate) 60.6% less (36,645 → 14,436)
Fixture answer signals (test/build/diff/…) Quality retention through reduction 60/60 correct
MCP discipline Bypasses, direct commands, rehydration 0 / 0 / 0
Baseline control arm Model without CostMax 59/60 (1 count miss, reported honestly)

The one control miss was the baseline arm (no CostMax): the model counted 9 matching files where the fixture had 10. The CostMax route answered that same case correctly in all three repetitions. Control-arm noise, reported honestly rather than hidden.

These are len(text)/4 estimates of tool-result text, not billed-token measurements. Methodology: docs/benchmark-methodology.md.

Why you can trust the numbers

Most token-compression tools report savings. CostMax ships the audit:

  • scripts/run-codex-eval.py runs the 20 fixtures in three arms: baseline (no CostMax), preflight (MCP availability), active (costmax_run required, Bash forbidden).
  • scripts/verify-live-results.py independently re-parses every raw Codex JSONL transcript. It fails if any active case bypassed MCP, called a command directly, rehydrated evidence, or missed its answer signal.
  • A post-render guard refuses to claim a saving when the full response (including metadata) is not actually shorter than the raw output.

Re-run the whole thing yourself:

go test -buildvcs=false -count=1 ./...
python3 scripts/run-codex-eval.py --self-test
python3 scripts/run-codex-eval.py --fixture-smoke
go build -buildvcs=false -o /tmp/costmaxx ./cmd/costmax/
bash scripts/verify-active-path.sh /tmp/costmaxx
python3 scripts/run-codex-eval.py --live --yes \
  --binary /tmp/costmaxx --preflight-runs 3 --repetitions 3
python3 scripts/verify-live-results.py results/<your-run> \
  --expected-cases 20 --expected-repetitions 3 --forbid-rehydration

Full retained results: docs/RESULTS.md · Independent audit write-up: docs/VERIFICATION.md


Usage

costmaxx hook                 # read a Codex lifecycle event from stdin (observe-only)
costmaxx mcp                  # start the MCP server (stdio JSON-RPC)
costmaxx install              # add CostMax's named MCP entry to Codex
costmaxx uninstall            # remove only that entry
costmaxx doctor               # check binary, config, storage, handshake
costmaxx status               # process-local metrics
costmaxx state <session-id>   # task state for a session
costmaxx report <session-id>  # session report from persisted metrics
costmaxx gc                   # garbage-collect old artifacts

What CostMax does not claim

  • No billed-dollar savings. Token figures are len(text)/4 estimates, not provider invoices.
  • No universal intelligence retention. Proven on deterministic fixtures, not arbitrary production repositories.
  • No automatic adoption. The model must call costmax_run explicitly; hooks remain observe-only.
  • Codex-only today. Hermes, Claude, and other harnesses are future work.

Docs

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md and the issue templates. Questions go to Discussions.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

Jump to

Keyboard shortcuts

? : This menu
/ : Search site
f or F : Jump to
y or Y : Canonical URL